‘Ah!-HaHa!-Aha!’: A Tool of Creativity Development in STEM Education

Authors

  • Chunfang Zhou University of Southern Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51355/j-stem.2025.151

Keywords:

Creativity, Emotion, Pedagogy, Design, STEM Education

Abstract

Creativity is a complex phenomenon. This paper highlights emotion mediates creativity development in various situations that happen in our everyday life. Particularly, three important emotional expressions of ‘Ah!’(wonder/curiosity), ‘HaHa!’(laughter/fun), and ‘Aha!’(discovery/inspiration) are focused on in the theoretical discussion that helps to explore links between emotion, creativity, teaching, and learning in STEM education. The interplay between experiences of ‘Ah!’, ‘HaHa!’ and ‘Aha!’ forms a new tool of ‘Ah!-HaHa!-Aha!’ that can be used to foster a creative climate. Furthermore, a pedagogical model is proposed for developing creativity in STEM education. The model integrates with ‘Ah!-HaHa!-Aha!’, Inquiry and Problem-Based Learning, Playful Learning, and Teaching for Deeper Learning in one framework. It regards everyday life as the learning context and underpins a systematic perspective to facilitate creativity in STEM education. This also provides STEM teachers with various methods and strategies to develop students’ creativity in their daily pedagogical practice.

References

Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A.,

Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H.-L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International

perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10118

Al-Ababneh, M. M. (2020). The concept of creativity: definitions and theories. International Journal of Tourism & Hotel Business Management, 2(1), 245-249.

Amabile, T. M. (1983). Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997-1013. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997

Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Westview Press, Inc.

Amos, R., Knippels, M. C., & Levinson, R. (2020). Socio-Scientific Inquiry-Based Learning: Possibilities and Challenges for Teacher Education. In: M. Evagorou, J. A. Nielsen, & J. Dillon (Ed.), Science Teacher Education for Responsible Citizenship: Towards a Pedagogy for Relevance through Socioscientific Issues (pp. 41-62). Cham: Springer.

Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 235-258.

Averill, J. R. (2005). Emotions as mediators and as products of creative activity. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Ed.), Creativity Across Domains: Faces of the Muse (pp. 225-244). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bazhydai, M., & Westermann, G. (2020). From curiosity, to wonder, to creativity: a cognitive developmental psychology perspective. In Schinkel, Anders (Ed.), Wonder, Education, and Human Flourishing. VU University Press.

Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Killing ideas softly? The promise and perils of creativity in the classroom. Information Age.

Boyer, W. A. R. (1997). Playfulness enhancement through classroom intervention for the 21st century. Childhood Education, 74(2), 90-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1998.10521925

Chang, C. P. (2013). Relationships between playfulness and creativity among student gifted in mathematics and science. Creative Education, 4(2), 101-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.42015

Chang, P. J., Qian, X., & Yarnal, C. (2013). Using playfulness to cope with psychological stress: Taking into account both positive and negative emotions. International Journal of Play, 2(3), 273-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2013.855414

Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109-138.

Chirico, A., Glaveanu, V. P., Cipresso, P., Giuseppe, R., & Gaggioli, A. (2018). Awe enhances creative thinking: an experimental study. Creativity Research Journal, 30(2),123-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1446491

Conner, T. S., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Creative days: a daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 463-470. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/aca0000022

Coombs, G., & Elden, M. (2004). Introduction to the special issue: problem-based learning as social inquiry- PBL and management education. Journal of Management Education, 28, 523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562904267540

Cornett, C. E. (1986). Learning through Laughter: Humor in Classroom. Michigan: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, the University of Michigan.

Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools, tensions, and dilemmas. Routledge.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: a systems view of creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Nature of Creativity (pp. 325-339). Cambridge University Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. Harper Collins.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a system perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp.313-335). Cambridge University Press.

Daud, A. D., Omar, J., Turiman, P., & Osman, K. (2011). Creativity in science education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 467-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.302

Dede, C. (2014). The Role of Digital Technologies in Deeper Learning. Students at the Center: Deeper Learning Research Series. Jobs for the Future.

De Vries, H. (2021). Space for STEAM: New creativity challenge in education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.586318

Draper, J. T., Freeling, B. S., & Connell, S. D. (2021). Sparking creativity in science education. Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(4), 893-898. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.495

Dunn, L. L. S. (2004). Cognitive Playfulness, Innovativeness, and Belief of Essentialness: Characteristics of Educators Who Have the Ability to Make Enduring Changes in the Integration of Technology into the Classroom Environment. University of North Texas.

Edwards, R. (2009). Introduction: Life as a learning context? In R. Edwards, G. Biesta & M. Thorpe (Ed.), Rethinking Contexts for Learning and Teaching (pp. 1-14). Routledge.

Ejsing-Duun, S., & Karoff, H. S. (2015). Creativity and playfulness: producing games as a pedagogical strategy. Proceedings of European Conference on Game Based Learning, Steinkjer, Norge.

Furman (1998). Teacher and pupil characteristics in the workplace: an perception of the creativity of classroom climate. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(4), 258-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1446503

Gardner, H. (1997). Extraordinary minds. Harper Collins.

Garner, R. L. (2006). Humor in pedagogy: how Ha-Ha can lead to Aha! College Teaching, 54(1), 177-179. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.54.1.177-180

Gerorge, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual turning in a supportive context: joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605-622. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.5465/AMJ.2007.25525934

Gl?veanu, V. P. (2019). Creativity and wonder. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(2), 171-177. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.225

Hadzigeorgiou, Y., Fokialis, P., & Kabouropoulou, M. (2012). Thinking about creativity in science education. Creative Education, 3(5), 603-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.35089

Harris, C. J., Krajcik, J. S., Pellegrino, J. W., & DeBanger, A. H. (2019). Designing knowledge-in-use assessment to promote deeper learning. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 38(2), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12253

Huy, Q. N. (1999). Emotional capability, emotional intelligence, and radical change. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 325-345. https://doi.org/10.2307/259085

Huy, Q. N. (2005). An emotion-based view of strategic renewal. Advances in Strategic Management, 22, 3-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-3322(05)22001-6

Illeris, K. (2007). How We Learn: Learning and Non-Learning in School and Beyond. Routledge.

Ismail, M. (2005). Creative climate and learning organization factors: their contributions towards innovation. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 26, 639-654. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730510633719

Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies, 30(1), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569032000159750

Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2006). Creative learning and possibility thinking. In B. Jeffrey (Ed.), Creative Learning Practices: European Experiences (pp. 49–64). Tufnell Press

Kaulman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Abilities Studies, 25, 53-69. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/13598139.2014.905247

Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

Loveness, A. (2002). Literature Review in Creativity, New Technologies and Learning. A Futurelab Research Report-Report 4. Futurelab.

Lubart, T. I., & Getz, I. (1997). Emotion, metaphor, and the creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 10(4), 285-301. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/s15326934crj1004_1

L’Ecuyer, C. (2014). The wonder approach to learning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00764

Mathisen, G. E., Einarsen, S., Jørstad, K., & Brønnick, K. S. (2004). Climate for work group creativity and innovation: Norwegian validation of the team climate inventory (TCI). Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45, 383-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00420.x

Mikdashi, T. (1999). Constitutive meaning and aspects of work environment affecting creativity in Lebanon. Participation and Empowerment: An International Journal, 7(3), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/14634449910277793

Newton, D. P. (2013). Moods, emotions and creative thinking: a framework for teaching. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.05.006

Oyama, Y., & Yagihashi, T. (2020). Question Based Instruction (QBI) promotes learner’s abilities to ask more questions and express opinions during group discussions. In E. Manalo (Ed.), Deeper Learning Dialogic Learning, and Critical Thinking: Research-Based Strategies for Classroom (pp. 123-140). Routledge.

Parse, R. R. (2002). Aha! Ah! HaHa! Discovery, Wonder, Laughter. Nursing Science Quarterly, 15(4), 273.

Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st- century. The National Academies Press.

Peter-Szarka, S. (2012). Creative climate as a means to promote creativity in the classroom. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10(3), 1011-1034.

Phillipson, N., & Wegerif, R. (2020). The thinking together approach to dialogic teaching. In E. Manalo (Ed.), Deeper Learning Dialogic Learning, and Critical Thinking: Research-Based Strategies for Classroom (pp. 32-47). Routledge.

Purichia, H. (2015). Problem-Based Learning: An Inquiry Approach. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem- Based Learning, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1522

Raj, H. & Saxena, D. (2021). Scientific creativity: A review of research. European Academic Research, 4(2), 1122-1138.

Rath, A., & Brown, D.E. (1996). Modes of engagement in science inquiry: A microanalysis of elementary students’ orientations toward phenomena at a science summer camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 1083-1097.

Richards, R. (2010). Everyday creativity: process and way of life-four key issues. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 189-215). Cambridge University Press.

Roo, J. J. (2020). ‘Laughter is the best medicine’: pedagogies of humour and joy that support critical thinking and communicative competence. In E. Manalo (Ed.), Deeper Learning Dialogic Learning, and Critical Thinking: Research-Based Strategies for Classroom (pp. 177-192). Routledge.

Russ, S. W. (2003). Play and creativity: Developmental issues. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 291–303. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/00313830308594

Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Emergence in creativity and development. In Sawyer, R. K., John-Steiner, V., Moran, S., Sternberg, R. J., Feldman, D. H., Nakamura, J., Csikszentmihalyi, M. (Ed.), Creativity and Development (pp. 12-60). Oxford University Press.

Sawyer, R. K. (2011). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. Oxford University Press.

Shalley, C.E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G.R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007

Shen, W., Yuan, Y., Liu, C., & Luo, J. (2016). In search of the ‘Aha!’ experience: elucidating the emotionality of insight problem-solving. British Journal of Psychology, 107, 281-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12142

Simons, K. D., & Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Scaffolding disciplined inquiry in problem-based environments. International Journal of Learning, 12(6), 297-305. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v12i06/47900

Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in Science: Change, Logic, Genius and Zeitgeist. Cambridge University Press.

Singer, E. (2013). Play and playfulness, basic features of early childhood education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 21(2), 172-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2013.789198

Sternberg, R. J. (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General psychology, 3(4), 292-316. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.3.4.292

Thagard, P., & Stewart, T. C. (2011). The Aha! experience: creativity through emergent binding in netual networks. Cognitive Science, 35, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01142.x

Topolinski, S., & Reber, R. (2010). Gainning insight into the ‘aha’ experience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 402-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410388803

Turner, J. H., & Stets, J. E. (2005). The Sociology of Emotions. Cambridge University Press.

Unver, A., & Arabac?oglu, S. (2011). Overviews On Inquiry Based and Problem Based Learning Methods. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Science. Special Issues, 302-309.

Van Kleef, G. A., Anastasopoulou, C., & Nijstad, B. (2010). Can expressions of anger enhance creativity? A test of the emotions as social information (EASI) model, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1042-1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.015

Villanova, A., & Cunha, M. P. (2020). Everyday creativity: a systematic literature review. Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.481

Wittrock, M.C. (1994). Generative science teaching. In P. Fensham, R. Gunstone, & R. White (Eds.), The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning (pp. 29–38). Falmer.

Zhou, C. (2014). A student project as an ‘extra group member’: A metaphor for the development of creativity in Problem-Based Learning (PBL). Akademisk kvarter, 9, 223-235. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.academicquarter.v0i09.3261

Zhou, C. (2016). Fostering Creative Problem Solvers in Higher Education: A Response to Complexity of Societies. In C. Zhou (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Creative Problem-Solving Skill Development in Higher Education (pp. 1-23). IGI global.

Zhou, C. (2017). How Ha-Ha Interplays with Aha! Supporting a Playful Approach to Creative Learning Environments. In T. Chemi, S. G. Davy, & B. Lund (Ed.), Innovative Pedagogy: A Recognition of Emotions and Creativity in Education (pp. 107-124). Brill/Sense.

Zhou, C., Rasmussen, P., Chemi, T., & Luo, L. (2017). An Investigation of Creative Climate of University R&D Centers and Policy Implications for Innovation in China. In Y. Jing, & S. Osborne (Eds.), Public Service Innovations in China (pp. 185-205). Palgrave Macmillan.

Zhou, C. (2018). A study on creative climate in Project-Organized Groups (POGs) in China and implications for sustainable pedagogy. Sustainability, 10(114), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010114

Zhou, C. (2019). In between Ha-Ha and Aha!: Technology Designers’ Humor as a Way of Creativity in Group Innovation Experience. Kindai Management Review, 7, 9-19.

Zhou, C. (2020). Introducing Problem-Based Learning (PBL) for Creativity and Innovation in Chinese Universities: Emerging Research and Opportunities. IGI Global.

Zhou, C., & Frisdahl, L. (2024). Entrepreneurship and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in STEM Teacher Education in High Schools: An Everyday Creativity Perspective. In Entrepreneurship Innovation and Education for Performance Improvement (pp. 30-52). IGI global.

Zhou, C., & Larsen, D. M. (2025). Developing Creativity in steM Education. In The Tenth Nordic Conference on Mathematics Education (NORMA 24): Interplay between Research and Teaching Practice in Mathematics Education (pp.433-480). Swedish Society for Research in Mathematics Education.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-25

How to Cite

Zhou, C. (2025). ‘Ah!-HaHa!-Aha!’: A Tool of Creativity Development in STEM Education. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 11(1-2), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.51355/j-stem.2025.151

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.