"My Picture is About Opening Up Students' Minds Beyond Our School Gate!" School Principals' Perceptions of STEM Learning Environments

Authors

  • Vesife Hatisaru University of Tasmania
  • Sharon Fraser University of Tasmania
  • Kim Beswick University of New South Wales

Keywords:

STEM Learning Environments, School Principals, Drawings, STEM Education

Abstract

The provision of effective leadership in STEM education is essential to support teachers to consider approaches to STEM and to carry them out effectively. Principals’ perceptions of STEM teaching and learning are, therefore, significant. In this paper we report on the perceptions of 21 primary and secondary school principals through their completion of the Draw a STEM Learning Environment Test (D-STEM), assessed through a customised rubric. Findings revealed that the participant principals maintained a diversity of interpretations of STEM learning environments primarily equated to the use of student-centred pedagogies in classrooms. Very few responses depicted and/or described teaching and learning practices anchored in realistic problems, which can enable the integration of individual STEM disciplines, and engage students in the translation of concepts across multiple representations. The use of representational tools remained implicit or was absent in most of the responses. Findings are discussed along with methodological issues, and implications and future research directions are suggested.

References

Aas, M., & Paulsen, J. M. (2019). National strategy for supporting school principal’s instructional leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(5), 540-553.

Aguilar, M. S., Rosas, A., Zavaleta, J., & Romo-Vázquez, A. (2016). Exploring high-achieving students’ images of mathematicians. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(3), 527-548.

Allen, M., Webb, A. W., & Matthews, C. E. (2016). Adaptive teaching in STEM: Characteristics for effectiveness. Theory into Practice, 55(3), 217 –224.

Ambusaidi, A. K., & Al-Balushi, S. M. (2012). A longitudinal study to identify prospective science teachers’ beliefs about science teaching using the draw-a-science-teacher-test checklist. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 7(2), 291-311.

Atkinson, R. D., & Mayo. M. (2010). Refuelling the U.S. innovation economy: Fresh approaches to science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Washington DC: The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation.

Australian Academy of Sciences. (2016). The mathematical sciences in Australia: A vision for 2025. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.

Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. Available at https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/mathematics/

Barrington, F., & Evans, M. (2014). Participation in Year 12 mathematics 2004-2013. AMSI. Retrieved from https://amsi.org.au/publications/participation-year-12-mathematics-2004-2013/

Beswick, K. (2007). Teachers’ beliefs that matter in secondary mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(1), 95–120.

Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 30–35.

Carpenter, D. M., & Peak, C. (2013). Leading Charters: How Charter School Administrators Define Their Roles and Their Ability to Lead (0892-0206). Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1019635&site=ehost-live http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0892020613487919

Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-a-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265.

Chan, K., Yeh, Y.-F., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2019). A framework for examining teachers’ practical knowledge for STEM teaching. In Y.-S. Hsu (Ed.), Asia-Pacific STEM teaching practices: From theoretical frameworks to practices (pp. 39–50). Singapore: Springer.

Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Available at http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards.pdf

Crawford, B. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937.

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287–312.

Elo, S., & Kyngäs (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Evans, I. M., Harvey, S. T., Bucley, L., & Yan, E. (2009). Differentiating classroom climate concepts: Academic, management, and emotional environments. New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 131–146. doi: doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2009.9522449.

Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Cramond, B. L. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the Draw-a-Scientist Test. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 195–205.

Fitzallen, N. (2015). STEM education: What does mathematics have to offer? In M. Marshman (Ed), Mathematics Education in the Margins. Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Sunshine Coast, (pp. 237–244). Sydney: MERGA.

Fraser, B. (2014). Classroom learning environments: Historical and contemporary perspectives. In Lederman, N. and Abell, S. (Eds). Handbook of Research on Science Education Volume II (pp. 104–119). USA: Routledge.

Gerard, L. F., Bowyer, J. B., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Principal leadership for technology-enhanced learning in science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1), 1–18.

Glancy, A. W., & Moore, T. J., (2013). Theoretical foundations for effective STEM learning environments. School of Engineering Education Working Papers. Paper 1.

Goodenough, F. L. (1926). Measurements of intelligence by drawings. World Book Co.

Goos, M., Geiger, V., & Dole, S. (2014). Transforming professional practice in numeracy teaching. In Y. Li, E. Silver & S. Li (Eds.), Transforming mathematics instruction: Multiple approaches and practices (pp. 81–102). New York: Springer.

Gulek, C. (1999). Using multiple means of inquiry to gain insight into classrooms: A multi-trait multi-method approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.

Haney, W., Russel, M., & Bebell, D. (2004). Drawing on education: Using drawings to document schooling and support change. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), 241–271.

Harris, L. R., Harnett, J. A., & Brown, G. (2009). “Drawing” out student conceptions: Using pupils’ pictures to examine their conceptions of assessment. In D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Students perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 53–83). Charlotte, NC: Information age publishing, Inc.

Hatisaru, V., Beswick, K., & Fraser, S. (2019). STEM learning environments: Perceptions of STEM education researchers. In G. Hine, S. Blackley, & A. Cooke (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 340-347). Perth: MERGA.

Hatisaru, V. (2019a). Lower secondary students’ views about mathematicians depicted as mathematics teachers. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 7(2), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.7.2.355

Hatisaru, V. (2019b). Putting the spotlight on mathematics classrooms. In J. Novotná & H. Moraová (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium Elementary Mathematics Teaching (pp. 182–192). ISBN 9788076030695.

Hobbs, L., Clark, J. C., & Plant, B. (2018). Successful students – STEM program: Teacher learning through a multifaceted vision for STEM education. In R. Jorgensen & K. Larkin (Eds.), STEM education in the junior secondary (pp. 133–168). Singapore: Springer Nature.

Johansson, D. A., & Sumpter, L. (2010). Childrens’ conceptions about mathematics and mathematics education. In K. Kislenko (Ed.), Proceedings of the MAVI-16 conference June 26–29, 2010 (pp. 77–88). Tallinn, Estonia: Tallinn University of Applied Sciences.

Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centred classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 34(5), 1–20.

Kennedy, T. L., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 24(3), 246–258.

Lake, V. E., & Kelly, L. (2014). Female preservice teachers and mathematics: Anxiety, Beliefs, and Stereotypes. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 35(3), 262–275.

Laine, A., Näveri, L., Ahtee, M., Hannula, M. S., & Pehkonen, E. (2013). Emotional atmosphere in third graders’ mathematics classroom – An analysis of pupils’ drawings. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 17(3–4), 101–116.

Laine, A., Ahtee, M., & Näveri, L. (2020). Impact of teachers’ actions on emotional atmosphere in mathematics lessons in primary school. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 163–181. doi: doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-09948-x

Lee, J-E, & Zeppelin, M. (2014). Using drawings to bridge the transition from student to future teacher of mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 333–346.

Lewthwaite, B. (2004). ‘Are you saying I’m to blame?’ Exploring the influence of a principal on elementary science delivery. Research in Science Education, 34(2), 137–152.

Losh, S. C., Wilke, R., & Pop, M. (2008). Some methodological issues with “Draw a Scientist Tests” among young children. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 773–792.

Likourezos, V., Beswick, K., Geiger, V., & Fraser, S. (2020). How principals can make a difference in STEM education. Australian Educational Leader, 42(2), 33–36.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston VA: Author.

Nelson, B. S. (2010). How elementary school principals with different leadership content knowledge profiles support teachers’ mathematics instruction. New England Mathematics Journal, 42, 43–53.

Matthews, S. (2012). A note on ‘image’ methodology for social work qualitative research: Socially inclusive research methods for service users. Social Work & Social Sciences Review, 15(3), 119–127.

Mead, M., & Metraux, R. (1957). Image of the scientist among high school students: A pilot study. Science, 126, 384–390.

Mewborn, D. S., & Cross, D. I. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics and links to students’ learning. In W. G. Martin, M. E. Strutchens, & P. C. Elliot (Eds.), The learning of mathematics (pp. 259–269). Reston, VA: NCTM.

Murphy, P. K., Delli, L. A. M., & Edwards, M. N. (2004). The good teacher and good teaching. Comparing the beliefs of second-grade students, preservice teachers, and inservice teachers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(2), 69–92.

Office of the Chief Scientist. (2012). Mathematics, engineering and science in the national interest. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia

Pape, S. J., & Tchoshanov, M. A. (2001). The Role of Representation(s) in Developing Mathematical Understanding. Theory into practice, 40(2), 118–127.

Pehkonen, E., Ahtee, M., Tikkanen, P., & Laine, A. (2011). Pupils’ conceptions on mathematics lessons revealed via their drawings. In B.Rösken & M. Casper (Eds.), Current State of Research on Mathematical Beliefs XVII. Proceedings of the MAVI-17 Conference (pp. 182–191). University of Bochum.

Pehkonen, E., Ahtee, M., & Laine, A. (2016). Pupils’ drawings as a research tool in mathematical problem-solving lessons. In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems: Advances and new perspectives (Research in mathematics education) (pp. 167–188). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Picker, S., & Berry, J., (2000). Investigating pupils’ images of mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43, 65–94.

Pietsch, M., & Tulowitzki, P. (2017). Disentangling school leadership and its ties to instructional practices – an empirical comparison of various leadership styles. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(4), 629–649.

Remesal, A. (2009). Accessing primary pupils’ conceptions of daily classroom assessment practices. In D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Students perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 25–51). Charlotte, NC: Information age publishing, Inc.

Robinson, V. M. J. (2007). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: Making sense of the evidence. https://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference_2007/5

Rock, D., & Shaw, J. M. (2000). Exploring children’s thinking about mathematicians and their work. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6(9), 550–555.

Roesken, B., Pepin, B., & Toerner, G. (2011). Beliefs and beyond: Affect and the teaching and learning of mathematics. ZDM, 43(4), 451–455.

Schroeder, T. L., & Lester Jr., F. K. (1989). Developing understanding in mathematics via problem solving. In P. R. Trafton & A. P. Shulte (Eds.), New Directions for Elementary School Mathematics (pp. 31–42). Reston, VA: NCTM.

Science and Technology Policy Division of the OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation. (2016). Policy profiles (OECD STI Outlook 2016). Retrieved from https://www.innovationpolicyplatform.org/content/policy-profiles-oecd-sti-outlook-2016

Smetana, L. K., Wenner, J., Settlage, J., & McCoach, D. B. (2016). Clarifying and capturing “trust” in relation to science education: dimensions of trustworthiness within schools and associations with equitable student achievement. Science Education, 100(1), 78–95.

Srikoom, W., Faikhamta, C., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2018). Dimensions of effective STEM integrated teaching practice. K-12 STEM Education, 4(2), 313–330.

Stohlmann, M., Moore, T., & Roehrig, G. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28–34.

Sullivan, P. (2011). Teaching mathematics: Using research-informed strategies. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Thomas, J. A., Pedersen, J. E., & Finson, K. (2001). Validating the Draw-A-Science-Teacher-Test Checklist: Exploring mental models and teacher beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(4), 295–310.

Timms, M., Moyle, K., Weldon, P., & Mitchell, P. (2018). Challenges in STEM learning in Australian schools. Policy Insights, Issue 7. Camberwell, VIC: ACER.

Tulowitzki, P. (2019). Supporting instructional leadership and school improvement? reflections on school supervision from a German perspective. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(5), 571–581.

Utley, J., & Showalter, B. (2007). Preservice elementary teachers’ visual images of themselves as mathematics teachers. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 29(3), 1–14.

Vasquez, J., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3–8: Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Wienk, M. (2017). Discipline profile of the mathematical sciences. Retrieved from https://amsi.org.au/wpcontent/uploads/2017/10/discipline-profile-2017-web.pdf

Zubrowski, B. (2002). Integrating science into design technology projects: Using a standard model in the design process. Journal of Technology Education, 13(2), 48–67.

Published

2020-06-28

How to Cite

Hatisaru, V., Fraser, S., & Beswick, K. (2020). "My Picture is About Opening Up Students’ Minds Beyond Our School Gate!" School Principals’ Perceptions of STEM Learning Environments. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 6(1), 18-38. Retrieved from https://j-stem.net/index.php/jstem/article/view/79

Issue

Section

Articles